Hi y'all.
As I see it the manufacturer carries the burden of responsibility, regardless which country individual parts are made. Components will fall into 2 categories (that I can bring to mind), those made to the manufacturer specifications, in the form of an engineering drawing and those bought in as proprietary items, like for example a shock absorber or a chain or battery etc etc. With these items the manufacturer of the motorcycle may or may not have a hand in the specification. In all these scenarios surely we should direct any criticism of quality control towards the motorcycle manufacturer. For example, if the packet says "made in India", so what? I say is it made to the engineering drawing?
The problems I've encountered over the Royal Enfields I've owned in more recent years have all been proprietary items. Thankfully very cheap ones in the grand scheme. Specifically batteries and chains. Neither of which were made by Royal Enfield. Both easily and cheaply remidied.
We're talking about extremely cheap bikes, comparatively, so we should except a fair chunk of value engineering to have been applied. What I hope is not to experience a disaster as a result of over zealous value engineering. Rather, that the machines naturally have limitations compared to a machine twice the price, but ultimately offer good value. So far, touch wood, Royal Enfield have more than met that requirement. Fingers crossed. Enjoy the bikes peeps 😁😎