I am with Andy on this, seems perverse to take a bike that works ie handles OK etc
Steffan
And stick a bl00dy sidecar on it. 
Only if you want to be able to carry more, not fall off in the snow and have handling that requires thinking on every corner.
Why do all these cruiser designs have the same small tank, long forks and wide bars? For practical considerations like stability a sidecar is a logical conclusion. When artists reach the same conclusion isn't it called derivative?
Andy
but thats the thing in the modern era, logic goes out of the window. if you want practical, buy a ford ka, better on juice, more reliable and probably costs less to tax. doesnt fall over in the snow and ice, starts every day, keeps you dry when it rains. you see, if you want to remove personal choice and taste from it all, and reduce transport to a purely practical method of transporting people from a to b, then sidecars, trikes and most bikes dont figure in it at all. however, if the choice is to be individual and left to the person doing the riding, then the method of transport is all their own, and they can choose whatever method it is that they think suits them. and if that method has a sidecar on the side, or a set of apehangers and 13 inch over front forks, then who are we to say its wrong?