Author Topic: Old classics, modern classics  (Read 7749 times)

Richard

  • Posts: 1377
  • Always wear protection
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #30 on: February 26, 2010, 01:13:19 PM »

At least your bike will go faster now Rob, less weight..............

Richard (fellow nut cutlet)
Note to Self: Shiney side goes UP.

guest987

  • Guest
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #31 on: February 26, 2010, 04:50:41 PM »
Indeed, less reciprocating mass.

Rub.

002

  • Posts: 1786
  • Stalwart(TM)
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #32 on: February 26, 2010, 05:11:23 PM »
Indeed, less reciprocating mass.

Rub.

Depends if you are wearing your Truss surely ?

Jethro
Cooey
Martini-Greener GP
Lee Enfield
ELG

Richard

  • Posts: 1377
  • Always wear protection
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #33 on: February 26, 2010, 05:17:29 PM »

I always wondered why the issue body armour didn't include an armoured cod piece.  Do you think theres a gap in the market ?

Richard
Note to Self: Shiney side goes UP.

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #34 on: February 26, 2010, 06:29:58 PM »
Jethro, do you have an idea of why your Beemer lunched its UJ? Was it just the stresses of hauling the outfit or was it something like the ride height being changed? Have you got a theory?

It seems to be an incredibly early failure of such a vital component. Beemers have been the charioteer's tug of choice for years so it is surprising that it failed so soon. Was it a problem that only affected the paralever?

Cheers
GC

guest987

  • Guest
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2010, 04:10:19 AM »

I always wondered why the issue body armour didn't include an armoured cod piece.  Do you think theres a gap in the market ?

Richard

I have one. Unfortuately if you wear it you look like a refugee from Cameo. ;)

Rub.

002

  • Posts: 1786
  • Stalwart(TM)
Re: Old classics, modern classics
« Reply #36 on: February 27, 2010, 10:41:59 AM »
Jethro, do you have an idea of why your Beemer lunched its UJ? Was it just the stresses of hauling the outfit or was it something like the ride height being changed? Have you got a theory?

It seems to be an incredibly early failure of such a vital component. Beemers have been the charioteer's tug of choice for years so it is surprising that it failed so soon. Was it a problem that only affected the paralever?

Cheers
GC

UJ and G/box are common failures on the Paralever models.
I changed the rear shock(common mod) to try and relieve the stress on the UJ.
I thought the same Beemers a good choice for a sidecar tug.But talking to some German friends the G/box is a common fault on all Beemers hauling sidecars.The Twin shock and Mono Levers last longest,some more than others.
Airhead Engines are very strong but need the Valve guides and valves replaced every 50k or there abouts(mine certainly did),and the charging system can be a little suspect.

Jethro
Cooey
Martini-Greener GP
Lee Enfield
ELG