Hi All
OK cards on table.
Wish I had nabbed one of Mat Oxley's "Honda enters Honda wind... Honda loses Honda quits" stickers all them years ago. Whilst I have more Hondas in the shed than any other make (2) I am not a great fan of the Big H - why - cos I like the underdog and I learnt on a Yamaha....
However - as a man who lost out on a Welsh natinal swimming title because I had only won 3 of 6 races and some one else came second and third in 5 of 6 and thus got more points than me... I really struggle with someone who is good at running mid pack being crowned a champion. The 25 / 20 / 16 / 13 etc points system addresses this much better than F1 (and far better than the swimming one which I will not go into). Had no problem with Roberts beating Sheen - both were consumate winners. Hurt when Spencer beat Roberts - well he was riding a Honda - but they were both great winners etc. Hayden does not even look like a winner most races. He appears to be a real nice guy, and unlike Pedrosa actually shows his personality. But I guess it jst balances out Mamola - he was a great rider who could win on a good bike and on a poor bike, but he never won the Chapionship. I also guess I feel sour because like Gibernau a couple of years ago Hayden seemed to believe he would win the championship because Rossi was having a bad time - no tbecause he could go out on any sunday and beat him.
As to Ferrari and Schui - well they may not have been winning when he moved to them - but they were and still are by far the best funded team on the grid, where as Yamaha have a much much smaller budget than Honda (British love of the underdog again) He (MS) moved from "Benetton" - or Renault as they were previously known - so he had won with "Yamaha" and moved to "Honda" - again unlike Damon Hill who moved to Arrows.... BGUt I guess like Rossi taking Burgess with him, Schui took Braun (and Todt?).
Hailwood Vs Rossi. Mmmmmmmmm Delalio Vs Schofield as the best Rugby forward (I think Schofield was a forward). Road racing and circuit racing are now very different things. Once upon a time - when I was very young - a man could take his BSA Goldstar, ride it home from work Friday, compete on it in a trial Friday night, a Scramble on Saturday, A roadrace on Sunday and a circuit race on Bank Holiday Monday before returning to work on Tuesday. All he needed to do was change the tyres. However now... Like Rugby Union and Rugby League roadracing and circuit racing are different beasts. The Gods of Raoads - Dunlop(X2), DJ etal have not made it big on the Circuits (Big as in winning titles that were not especially made for them) Ditto Circuit racers on the roads. Hailwood was from a time when the disiplines and the bikes were so similar that you could race on both - well the World Championship covered both. I am sure that Rossi COULD do a lap close to record speed - but either he would have to devote a number of years learning - like most do - the disipline of road racing. Simulaly I am sure Lougher (spelling) could do a good job on a MotoGP bike - but neither are really interested - nor good enough - to get the call. If Hailwood were racing today - apart from being incredibly old compared to the rest of the paddock - he too would have to settle for one or the other - or be an enthusiastic clubman.
The only "modern" rider to excel on both the roads and the circuits as far as I remember was Foggy.
The last person to win more than one WC in a year was (again as far as I remember) Spencer and it is concidered that the strain of doiing the 250/500 double shortened his career.
Who is the better - Hailwood or Rossi - different sports. Who is the best Wilkinson or Beckham....?
R