Aye welland99,
With plain chain, no sealing rings, the side plate is a sliding fit over the pins of the connecting plate.
With some sealing ring chains the side plate is a sliding/slip fit over the pins of the connecting plate and the seals require compression to expose the grooves on the connecting link pins to the outside of the connecting plate, into which the spring link is then slid.
Finally, there are sealing ring chains that have a press fit/interference fit between the side plate and the connecting link pins. At the inner end of the interference fit pins there are machined shoulders that prevent the side plate from further compressing the sealing rings and yet allow the spring link slots to be exposed on the connecting link pins outside of the side plate, ready for installing the spring link. This greater degree of complication during manufacture and effort during fitting is an effort by the manufacturers to prevent the "tight link" syndrome that can also be readily achieved when rivetting links.
In the ideal world, with chain transmissions from the gearbox to the rear wheel, we would all fit endless chains that required removal of the swingarm whenever we wished to renew the chain. Users of the toothed belt final drive systems face this dilemma regularly, yet it doesn't dampen their ardour for the motorcycle brand.

However, that is another load of harrumphing for another thread!

I'm sticking with plain chain on the Duke 450, no room for sealed link chain between the sprocket and the cases,and reducing the chain from 530 to 428. It just requires my attention, rather than the "Fit and Forget" mentallity and if you have seen the state of some sealed link chains being used, red with rust or buried in caked on grime, safety is down to the awareness of the user. If you don'know, don't ask or aren't told, why would you worry?

Happy linking!

My regards, Bill