Good build although not my style. But why a "Norton"? This is a Norton:
Agreed Ian. Wholeheartedly! I got the single seat on it about 2013 I think, and as the tail shape was a bit reminiscent of the rotary racers, I thought abut some sort of "black and 3 grey line" type colour scheme, or play on the JPS logos etc.
Also, it was about the time Norton were "coming back" (...as they have been since about 1982 - present...) and I think I kind of thought- "if they built something like this (sort of) then people would buy it..." A big stupid single, in a decent chassis. So I made it a "660 Manx" as a fictitious model
In the end when I got it just got painted flat black, I decided to break it up a bit with the Norton logos. Not sure- maybe I missed mine, and like seeing the curly script.
Also I thought it similar to the C652 idea. Lots of Skorpion bits/ people/ influence on the C652 Joe Siefert built, (even more with the "combat" prototype) and its kind of a bit like that.
I did enjoy people telling me at the lights that it was great to see British bikes coming back, or thumbs up from cabbies etc!
Pretty sure I will escape without a cease and desist letter, but I cant help feel that if Norton offered a non-premium product, it could be a big single built (a bit) down to a price with good components and reasonable suspension, then they would buy it. So many others are...
I think I should stick with the old stuff, cos I don't see anything promising coming from my favoured brand any time soon...
(And certainly not a 660 Manx)
Andy