Author Topic: Possible Shed Meet & Camping  (Read 2689 times)

guest18

  • Guest
Re: Possible Shed Meet & Camping
« Reply #30 on: July 26, 2009, 10:53:12 PM »
Thanks mate, would love to but I'm trying to be good and save money and reduce the amount of kit we need to move when the time comes  ::) I hope we get our first choice because our second will deprive me of the size of workshop I have become used to!  :'(

;D swmbo says beware, she may refuse to feed you as well!  :o

Wish I could come down.. pipe bender (drool...) but stuck here doing work on the large boring shed annex...
Ho hum, have fun everyone!

Smudge
If you are interested in anything give John a ring and I can always store it here for you.

Boyd

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Possible Shed Meet & Camping
« Reply #31 on: July 30, 2009, 04:41:02 PM »
Boyd, Themoudie, Jethro and RobG - I will PM you about why I removed your posts.

Cheers
GC  ;)

mini-thumper

  • Posts: 921
Re: Possible Shed Meet & Camping
« Reply #32 on: July 30, 2009, 05:42:49 PM »
GC
The don't remember any reference to the issue you elude to. Are you able to forward me a copy or has it already been burnt. I hope this is not a disturbing escalation of your Stalinist style of leadership, ie. presentation and removal of facts/evidence before anyone can deny or refute them? If I hear the front door being kicked in at around 04:00am tomorrow I know what to expect. And, "No!", it won't be the Spanish Inquisition as nobody expects them!

Boyd 

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Possible Shed Meet & Camping
« Reply #33 on: July 30, 2009, 08:43:52 PM »
Yep, sorry for the heavy-handed unilateral action. I've PM'd you again about this to explain why I did it.

Cheers
GC

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Possible Shed Meet & Camping
« Reply #34 on: August 02, 2009, 07:39:33 PM »
Re. Deleting of posts

Just to clarify my actions, in the face of another shitstorm, nothing was intended as a personal slight or judgement of intent. I was probably over-sensitive to one statement and this was entirely due to the context of the thread it was posted in. The other posts were only pulled because they referenced the original comment.

If the posts had contained aything other than quips and one-liners then I would, of course, have consulted each person to give them the chance to edit (or not) as they saw fit.

My only consideration was to avoid giving offence, but in true Carrick fashion I seem to have annoyed four for the sake of one.

If it's any consolation I consulted Mrs Onepot on the matter before deleting the posts and she agreed with me. And trust me that doesn't happen often at home  ::)

GC